Join the community!
Visit our GitHub or LinkedIn page to join the Tilburg Science Hub community, or check out our contributors' Hall of Fame!
Want to change something or add new content? Click the Contribute button!
Github Issues can be used to clearly define tasks that either you or your team members will eventually work on. In combination with Kanban-style GitHub Project boards, they become a compelling way of coordinating teamwork. They also help you keep track of what’s happening on projects and provide a durable, replicable record of the work for future reference.
This building block aims to provide comprehensive guidance on the efficient use of GitHub Issues, teaching you how to write GitHub issues that get the job done! It begins with an introduction to GitHub Issues and subsequently delves into the best practices.
Getting Started with Issues
Every issue has a creator (i.e., the person who created it) and should have one or more assignees (the person(s) who will execute it). The creator chooses the assignee when the issue is created.
An issue is a discrete, well-defined unit of work on a project. Usually, this means that an issue should not be more than a couple of weeks' worth of work and should not be open for more than a month or two.
Issues are adaptable. For example, an issue that started with manageable scope may grow as the project expands or new questions arise. At this point, it can be split into separate issues, and the initial issue closed with an interim summary.
Issues are prioritized using the Project Board on GitHub. You can work on open issues outside the current sprint if you have time left.
All such rules are just a guideline. Using your time productively takes precedence over the priority ordering of tasks.
One common problem with Issues is that they are formulated too broadly. They then are likely to become open-ended and end up mixing multiple work threads.
Phrases like “Write the follow-up paper” or “Do the analysis” are typically unsuitable unless the project is tiny.
GitHub Issues Best Practices
Use Descriptive Titles!
- The issue title should be descriptive enough that somebody looking back at it later will understand what the purpose of the issue was and how it fits into the larger context.
- Titles should use the imperative mood, and not end in a period (“Revise the main figure”) not (“main figure.").
- This post by Chris Beams has an excellent discussion of what makes a good Git commit message; the same principles apply to issue titles.
Good issue titles
- Revise abstract
- Add new data to main robustness figure
- Run bootstrap for IV regressions
Bad issue titles
- Incorrect inputs causing error.
Note that you can also change the title of an issue to make it more accurately reflect the current task.
Set Goals with Clear Descriptions
- State the goals of the issue clearly.
- Be explicit about the deliverables.
- Like the title, it should usually be written in imperative mode.
- The description should be precise enough that a third party can judge whether the issue was completed or not.
- It should include enough explanation and context that someone who is not intimately familiar with the other work going on at that moment can understand it clearly – remember that we will often be returning to these issues many months or even years later and trying to understand what was going on.
- If an issue relates directly to one or more other issues, this should be stated in the description with a link to the other issue(s) (e.g., “Follow-up to #5”).
Following #22, re-run the analysis on Research Cloud to see if that improves performance.
- Run a minimal version of the base model on VM1
- Test the subsampling procedure on VM1
- Run a minimal version of the base model on VM2
- Test the subsampling procedure on VM2
Document necessary code changes to implement our updated code and potential bottlenecks. In the long term, we want to migrate all of our model computations to Research Cloud.
Redoing everything on Research Cloud, including the subsampling. Remember we want to test VM1, not only VM2.
Document Progress through Comments
Comments in the Github Issue threads are the main way we communicate about our work.
You can add comments to the thread in a browser or by replying to a notification email about the issue. When commenting by email reply, remember to delete the quoted text of the email thread below your actual reply. Otherwise, this will add duplicate text to the comment thread and make it hard to read.
You (the assignee) should post comments regularly summarizing progress.
- The comment threads are your real estate, and you are free to include updates as often as you find helpful.
- Preliminary output, “notes to self,” etc., are acceptable.
- No issue should be left for more than two weeks without a comment updating the status, even if the comment only says: “Have not done any work on this issue in the last week.”
If you have a question that requires input or attention from another lab member, you should write a comment, including an ‘@’ reference, that clarifies precisely what information is needed.
- For example,
@hannesdatta, Where would you like me to store the data files?
- Users should keep email notifications for
@references turned on. Anyone who is not the assignee of an issue will assume by default that comments not @-referencing them do not require their attention.
- For example,
It is up to you to judge the optimal time to request feedback from the reporter (or PIs on the project, etc.). You should usually not send results until you have made sure they are correct and make sense. When you request feedback, you should provide a clear and concise summary, making the situation clear and exactly what input you need. At the same time, you should not feel shy about requesting feedback when you are confident it will be efficient and valuable.
If you have an important interaction about an issue outside of GitHub – in person, over video chat, etc. – add a comment to briefly summarize the content of that interaction and the conclusions reached.
Issues are referenced by their Github issue number (e.g., “#5”) when it is clear from the context what repository the issue is in, or by the name of the repository plus the issue number (e.g., “news_trends #5”) when it is not. Any reference to a GitHub issue in a comment thread, email, etc., should be hyperlinked to the issue itself. Note that GitHub does this automatically if you type “#” followed by a number in a GitHub issue thread.
Any reference to a file, directory, paper, or webpage should be hyperlinked to a permanent URL. This page has instructions for getting permanent URLs for files in Github repositories. Links to Dropbox files and directories can be copied from the web or desktop client.
Every issue must conclude with a reproducible deliverable.
It is up to you (the assignee) to judge when the objectives in the task description plus any issues that have come up in the comment stream have been resolved. As a rule, you do not need to request confirmation from the issue’s creator (or project lead).
Each task should have a final deliverable containing all relevant results. The form of the deliverable may be any combination of:
- Content at Tilburg Science Hub
- Content added to a research project (e.g., a draft of a paper, slides, analysis) in the project repository
- A PDF or markdown file
- A summary in the final comment in the issue thread
The deliverable must be self-contained. It should usually begin with a concise summary of the task goal and the conclusions (e.g., an answer to an empirical question), followed by supporting detail. A user should learn all relevant results from the deliverable without looking back at the comment thread or task description.
Use this template to start writing issues
# Goal of this issue Clearly define the goal. # Resources Say which resources to use (e.g., where to find relevant code, papers, etc.). # Deliverables Clearly define deliverables. Mention deadlines if necessary.
- When an issue is complete, you should post a final summary comment and then close it.
- All closed issues must have one and only one summary comment.
- If changes are made after the issue is closed (e.g., during peer review), you should edit the summary comment in place rather than create a new one.
- At this point, you will also normally open a pull request to peer review the issue and merge the issue branch back to the master.
Close an Issue with a final comment
- Your final comment should begin with “Summary” on the first line (usually in bold or title font).
- It must also include a brief (usually a couple of paragraphs) recap of what was accomplished in the issue.
- It must include a revision-stable pointer to the deliverable – usually a link along with additional information if needed (e.g., relevant page/table/figure numbers in the draft), or reference to a branch on GitHub.
- Priorities to work on issues are coordinated using the GitHub Project Boards.
- If you have time left in your sprint, you can work on other open issues.
- In prioritizing your work, note that peer review takes priority over all open issues; open issues created earlier should take precedence over tasks created later.
- In some cases, we may give explicit instructions that override these defaults (e.g., we tag an issue with “good issue to start”, or “critical”). If you are ever unsure about prioritization, you should ask.
By adhering to these best practices, you’ll harness the full potential of GitHub Issues, streamlining collaboration and enriching project management:
- Use descriptive titles
- Set goals with clear descriptions
- Document progress through comments
- Provide self-contained deliverables
- Close issues with concise summaries
- Prioritize tasks effectively